Free tool · no signup · runs in your browser
The reply quality checklist
Ten checks, thirty seconds. Grade any X reply on specificity, added value, voice, and account-risk signals — before your name is attached to it. Nothing is uploaded; the score is computed on this page.
–
Tick the checks to score your reply
Score updates as you tick. There is no submit button and nothing leaves this page.
How the score is banded
The bands are deliberately strict — they describe a reply worth posting, not a reply that merely avoids trouble.
| Score | Band | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 9–10 | Post it | The reply adds something only you could add. This is the standard worth holding. |
| 7–8 | Fix one thing first | Usually c4 or c7: get specific, or get shorter. A one-minute edit. |
| 5–6 | Rewrite | The reply is safe but filler. Pick one pattern — reason, example, condition, question — and rebuild it. |
| 0–4 | Do not post | This is the generic agreement the timeline already drowns in. It costs your account more than it earns. |
Where this checklist comes from. The ten checks compress the same criteria used across our writing guides: the 30-second editing pass, the six annotated reply patterns, and the account-risk rules in what X’s automation rules actually allow. For how much of the workflow you can safely automate, see automating replies without spamming.
Drafting fifty replies a week?
TweetReplier drafts inside X, learns your voice, and never posts without you — the review step this checklist automates the slow way.